Skip to content Skip to navigation menu
Single Row Steel Cylindrical Bearing

NU 330 ECM

Single Row Steel Cylindrical Bearing
Item #100743128
  • 5.91 in Inner Diameter
  • 12.6 in Outer Diameter
  • 2.56 in Width
Single Row Steel Cylindrical Bearing
Price Unavailable
Price Unavailable
Pricing is unavailable at this time. Please contact Customer Service for assistance.
Online Ordering Restricted
Please contact Customer Service for assistance.
Contact Customer Service
    Shipment Options
  • 5.91 in Inner Diameter
  • 12.6 in Outer Diameter
  • 2.56 in Width

description

  • The EC design contains improvements in guiding surfaces of flanges and roller ends, which means that EC bearings have a high axial load-carrying capacity.

applications

  • Traction motors
  • Electric motors
  • Gearboxes

features

  • Improved roller-end-to-flange contact
  • Increased capacity

compliances

  • In accordance with ISO 15-1981
Bore Type Round Bore
Static Load Rating [Max] 217000 lbf
Capacity High Capacity
Material Steel
O.D. Type Cylindrical
I.D. 150 mm
Rows of Balls Single
Inner Ring Width 2.56 in, 65 mm
Heat Stabilization 302 °F
Radial Internal Clearance Group N
Limiting Speed - Grease 1700 rpm
Bearing Part Complete Bearing
Relubrication Feature Without
Series 3
Bearing Design Removable Inner Ring – Straight
Enclosure Open
Outer Ring Width 2.56 in, 65 mm
Bearing Type Radial
Cage Material Brass/Bronze
Full Cage Description Machined Brass Cage
Inch/Metric Metric
Precision Rating ABEC 1
Width 2.56 in, 65 mm
Limiting Speed 2000 rpm
Origin Cylindrical Radial
Static Load Rating 965 kN
No. of Ribs - Outer Ring 2
Cage Type Solid Machined
No. of Rows 1
Tolerance Normal (PN)
Precision Ground Yes
Dynamic Load Rating 176000 lbf
End Type Open End
O.D. 320 mm
Limiting Speed - Oil 2000 rpm
Radial Internal Clearance Specification Normal Clearance
Oil Hole w/o Oil Hole
Weight 59.19 LB
EAN or UPC 7316576628481
We're here for you
with Service Centers across the country -
We have your back
Close Compare List Open Compare List Toggle

Product Comparison