Skip to content Skip to navigation menu
Single Row Steel Cylindrical Bearing

NU 330 ECM

Single Row Steel Cylindrical Bearing
Item #100743128
  • 5.91 in Inner Diameter
  • 12.6 in Outer Diameter
  • 2.56 in Width
Single Row Steel Cylindrical Bearing
Price Unavailable
Price Unavailable
Pricing is unavailable at this time. Please contact Customer Service for assistance.
Online Ordering Restricted
Please contact Customer Service for assistance.
Contact Customer Service
    Shipment Options
  • 5.91 in Inner Diameter
  • 12.6 in Outer Diameter
  • 2.56 in Width

description

  • The EC design contains improvements in guiding surfaces of flanges and roller ends, which means that EC bearings have a high axial load-carrying capacity.

applications

  • Traction motors
  • Electric motors
  • Gearboxes

features

  • Improved roller-end-to-flange contact
  • Increased capacity

compliances

  • In accordance with ISO 15-1981
No. of Rows 1
Origin Cylindrical Radial
Radial Internal Clearance Group N
Bore Type Round Bore
Outer Ring Width 2.56 in, 65 mm
O.D. 320 mm
Dynamic Load Rating 176000 lbf
Bearing Part Complete Bearing
Cage Material Brass/Bronze
Tolerance Normal (PN)
Rows of Balls Single
Heat Stabilization 302 °F
Bearing Design Removable Inner Ring – Straight
Material Steel
O.D. Type Cylindrical
I.D. 150 mm
Series 3
No. of Ribs - Outer Ring 2
Limiting Speed - Oil 2000 rpm
Bearing Type Radial
Limiting Speed 2000 rpm
Oil Hole w/o Oil Hole
Radial Internal Clearance Specification Normal Clearance
Relubrication Feature Without
Static Load Rating 965 kN
Full Cage Description Machined Brass Cage
Cage Type Solid Machined
Inch/Metric Metric
Precision Rating ABEC 1
Static Load Rating [Max] 217000 lbf
Capacity High Capacity
End Type Open End
Inner Ring Width 2.56 in, 65 mm
Enclosure Open
Width 2.56 in, 65 mm
Limiting Speed - Grease 1700 rpm
Precision Ground Yes
Weight 59.19 LB
EAN or UPC 7316576628481
We're here for you
with Service Centers across the country -
We have your back
Close Compare List Open Compare List Toggle

Product Comparison