Skip to content Skip to navigation menu
Single Row Steel Cylindrical Bearing

NU 330 ECM

Single Row Steel Cylindrical Bearing
Item #100743128
  • 5.91 in Inner Diameter
  • 12.6 in Outer Diameter
  • 2.56 in Width
Single Row Steel Cylindrical Bearing
Price Unavailable
Price Unavailable
Pricing is unavailable at this time. Please contact Customer Service for assistance.
Online Ordering Restricted
Please contact Customer Service for assistance.
Contact Customer Service
    Shipment Options
  • 5.91 in Inner Diameter
  • 12.6 in Outer Diameter
  • 2.56 in Width

description

  • The EC design contains improvements in guiding surfaces of flanges and roller ends, which means that EC bearings have a high axial load-carrying capacity.

applications

  • Traction motors
  • Electric motors
  • Gearboxes

features

  • Improved roller-end-to-flange contact
  • Increased capacity

compliances

  • In accordance with ISO 15-1981
Bearing Type Radial
Inner Ring Width 2.56 in, 65 mm
End Type Open End
Limiting Speed 2000 rpm
Static Load Rating 965 kN
Width 2.56 in, 65 mm
Bearing Design Removable Inner Ring – Straight
Oil Hole w/o Oil Hole
Limiting Speed - Oil 2000 rpm
Origin Cylindrical Radial
Series 3
Full Cage Description Machined Brass Cage
Cage Type Solid Machined
Inch/Metric Metric
O.D. Type Cylindrical
Enclosure Open
Heat Stabilization 302 °F
Rows of Balls Single
Relubrication Feature Without
Precision Ground Yes
No. of Ribs - Outer Ring 2
Cage Material Brass/Bronze
No. of Rows 1
Material Steel
Dynamic Load Rating 176000 lbf
Radial Internal Clearance Specification Normal Clearance
Tolerance Normal (PN)
Outer Ring Width 2.56 in, 65 mm
Radial Internal Clearance Group N
Bearing Part Complete Bearing
Bore Type Round Bore
Static Load Rating [Max] 217000 lbf
I.D. 150 mm
O.D. 320 mm
Limiting Speed - Grease 1700 rpm
Precision Rating ABEC 1
Capacity High Capacity
Weight 59.19 LB
EAN or UPC 7316576628481
We're here for you
with Service Centers across the country -
We have your back
Close Compare List Open Compare List Toggle

Product Comparison