Skip to content Skip to navigation menu
Single Row Steel Cylindrical Bearing

NU 330 ECM

Single Row Steel Cylindrical Bearing
Item #100743128
  • 5.91 in Inner Diameter
  • 12.6 in Outer Diameter
  • 2.56 in Width
Single Row Steel Cylindrical Bearing
Price Unavailable
Price Unavailable
Pricing is unavailable at this time. Please contact Customer Service for assistance.
Online Ordering Restricted
Please contact Customer Service for assistance.
Contact Customer Service
    Shipment Options
  • 5.91 in Inner Diameter
  • 12.6 in Outer Diameter
  • 2.56 in Width

description

  • The EC design contains improvements in guiding surfaces of flanges and roller ends, which means that EC bearings have a high axial load-carrying capacity.

applications

  • Traction motors
  • Electric motors
  • Gearboxes

features

  • Improved roller-end-to-flange contact
  • Increased capacity

compliances

  • In accordance with ISO 15-1981
O.D. 320 mm
Full Cage Description Machined Brass Cage
Radial Internal Clearance Specification Normal Clearance
Rows of Balls Single
O.D. Type Cylindrical
No. of Rows 1
Material Steel
Bore Type Round Bore
Tolerance Normal (PN)
Bearing Type Radial
Static Load Rating 965 kN
No. of Ribs - Outer Ring 2
End Type Open End
Capacity High Capacity
Outer Ring Width 2.56 in, 65 mm
Inner Ring Width 2.56 in, 65 mm
Dynamic Load Rating 176000 lbf
Limiting Speed - Oil 2000 rpm
Relubrication Feature Without
Limiting Speed - Grease 1700 rpm
Width 2.56 in, 65 mm
Inch/Metric Metric
Cage Material Brass/Bronze
Static Load Rating [Max] 217000 lbf
Radial Internal Clearance Group N
Limiting Speed 2000 rpm
Bearing Design Removable Inner Ring – Straight
Bearing Part Complete Bearing
Precision Rating ABEC 1
Series 3
I.D. 150 mm
Precision Ground Yes
Origin Cylindrical Radial
Heat Stabilization 302 °F
Cage Type Solid Machined
Oil Hole w/o Oil Hole
Enclosure Open
Weight 59.19 LB
EAN or UPC 7316576628481
We're here for you
with Service Centers across the country -
We have your back
Close Compare List Open Compare List Toggle

Product Comparison