Skip to content Skip to navigation menu
Single Row Steel Cylindrical Bearing

NU 330 ECM

Single Row Steel Cylindrical Bearing
Item #100743128
  • 5.91 in Inner Diameter
  • 12.6 in Outer Diameter
  • 2.56 in Width
Single Row Steel Cylindrical Bearing
Price Unavailable
Price Unavailable
Pricing is unavailable at this time. Please contact Customer Service for assistance.
Online Ordering Restricted
Please contact Customer Service for assistance.
Contact Customer Service
    Shipment Options
  • 5.91 in Inner Diameter
  • 12.6 in Outer Diameter
  • 2.56 in Width

description

  • The EC design contains improvements in guiding surfaces of flanges and roller ends, which means that EC bearings have a high axial load-carrying capacity.

applications

  • Traction motors
  • Electric motors
  • Gearboxes

features

  • Improved roller-end-to-flange contact
  • Increased capacity

compliances

  • In accordance with ISO 15-1981
Static Load Rating 965 kN
Width 2.56 in, 65 mm
I.D. 150 mm
Bore Type Round Bore
Full Cage Description Machined Brass Cage
Material Steel
Limiting Speed - Grease 1700 rpm
End Type Open End
Series 3
Static Load Rating [Max] 217000 lbf
Oil Hole w/o Oil Hole
Dynamic Load Rating 176000 lbf
Cage Type Solid Machined
Rows of Balls Single
Heat Stabilization 302 °F
Precision Rating ABEC 1
Tolerance Normal (PN)
Enclosure Open
Limiting Speed 2000 rpm
Limiting Speed - Oil 2000 rpm
Inch/Metric Metric
O.D. Type Cylindrical
No. of Rows 1
Outer Ring Width 2.56 in, 65 mm
Bearing Design Removable Inner Ring – Straight
Inner Ring Width 2.56 in, 65 mm
Cage Material Brass/Bronze
O.D. 320 mm
Radial Internal Clearance Specification Normal Clearance
Relubrication Feature Without
Capacity High Capacity
Origin Cylindrical Radial
Bearing Part Complete Bearing
No. of Ribs - Outer Ring 2
Bearing Type Radial
Precision Ground Yes
Radial Internal Clearance Group N
Weight 59.19 LB
EAN or UPC 7316576628481
We're here for you
with Service Centers across the country -
We have your back
Close Compare List Open Compare List Toggle

Product Comparison